D. P. Cole's review and rating:
I don't know what came first: This story or anti-government groups in reality. If the story fails, this is why - ambiguity and too much consideration placed on one plot device. On the other hand, anti-government scenarios like this are all-too-common in 1990s America. Perhaps this is why I am no longer fond of the story as I once was? It's a shame, in a terrible sort of way, that real life turned what was once a phenomenal story into trite "yawnesque" material. So, did this story grimly satire reality, or was it ahead of its time?
But there are plenty of moments which vindicate the story, despite its [now] trite origins. Mainly when the guys' car is vandalized in front of their eyes, which is very chilling and not to say rude -- and what they do when they fight back - which had me cheering all the way. It's still "emotional candy" but heck, most stories regardless of depth succeed because they know how to properly manipulate the viewer's emotions.
The ending is too predictable for my liking, but Scott's response to one of the town's residents about not wanting the situation to become violent is brilliant and makes up for it. It also makes one wonder why such stories don't make people wake up and realize violence is no answer for any problem.
Considering this form of anti-government scenario was so rare (unlike today), it still deserves a higher score for trying to be bold in a way that even Star Trek (the sci-fi show which paralleled real life events but in a sci-fi setting so the network would not really care) could not attempt.
Rating: 7/10 (given today's events)
8.5/10 (if the government was still mostly respected by the public in general.)
|